Diary of Johann Kremer

Confession of gassings at Auschwitz Birkenau by an SS doctor

SS-Obersturmführer Johann Paul Kremer, M.D., Ph.D., (1883-1965) was a professor of anatomy and human genetic at Münster University. He joined the Wehrmacht on May 20, 1941 and served in the SS in the Auschwitz concentration camp as a physician during World War II, from 30 August 1942 to 18 November 1942.

Johann Paul Kremer at the The Auschwitz Trial in Kraków 1947

During his relativly short service as a medical doctor at Auschwitz (3 months when he replaced an ill doctor) he witnesses shootings and beatings. He killed some of the prisoners by phenol injections in the heart and picked out some who struck him as particularly good experimental material. One could say he took forced donations of organs from patients who were ill but not dead yet, by giving them lethal injections

As a SS witness to the gassings at Auschwitz he is important. His confessions comes from before the end of the war, before any hearings or trial, in the notes he made in his diary. He wrote for example: 

"September 2, 1942

For the first time, at 3:00 A.M. outside, attended a special action. Dante's Inferno seems to me almost a comedy compared to this. They don't call Auschwitz the camp of annihilation for nothing! 

September 5, 1942 

In the morning attended a sonderaktion [special action] from the women's concentration camp (Muslims); the most dreadful of horrors. Master-Sergeant Thilo (troop doctor) was right when he said to me that this is the anus mundi [=anus of the world]. In the evening towards 8:00 attended another special action from Holland. Because of the special rations they get a fifth of a liter of schnapps, 5 cigarettes, 100 g salami and bread, the men all clamor to take part in such actions. Today and tomorrow (Sunday) work."

"Muslim" (german Muselmann, or polish Muzułman) was an expression used in the camp refering to emaciated, sick, apathetic people suffering from exhaustion and starvation, resigned to their impending death. Survivors have described this kind of prisoners in their biographies. They were resigned and exhausted, didn't have much will anymore, and were often unresponsive to their surroundings. They were incapable to work and was taken away during the selections (i.e at the daily roll call or appell in the morning) to be gassed or killed in some other way as they were of no use in the workforce anymore.

The description of schnapps, cigarettes etc might seem absurd in this context. But Dr Kremer has later (at the 1965 Auschwitz trial) explained that SS men who were present during sonderaktion was given some extra goods. Kremer adds that it was "humanly quite understandable. This was war was it not, and the cigarettes and schnaps were rare." 

At the Auschwitz trial in Kraków in 18 July 1947 Dr Kremer testified about the above diary entries, saying:

"Particularly unpleasant was the gassing of the emaciated women from the women's camp, who were generally known as 'Muslims'. I remember I once took part in the gassing of one of these groups of women. I cannot say how big the group was. 

When I got close to the bunker [I saw] them sitting on the ground. They were still clothed. As they were wearing worn-out camp clothing they were not left in the undressing hut but made to undress in the open air. 

I concluded from the behavior of these women that they had no doubt what fate awaited them, as they begged and pleaded to the SS men to spare them their lives. However, they were herded into the gas chambers and gassed. 

As an anatomist I have seen a lot of terrible things: I had had a lot of experience with dead bodies, and yet what I saw that day was like nothing I had ever seen before. Still completely shocked by what I had seen I wrote in my diary on 5 September 1942: 'The most dreadful of horrors. Hauptscharführer Thilo was right when he said to me today that this is the anus mundi', the anal orifice of the world. 

I used this image because I could not imagine anything more disgusting and horrific. 

(From the book The Good Old Days: The Holocaust As Seen by Its Perpetrators and Bystanders, Ernst Klee, Willi Dressen, and Volker Riess, Eds., 1991, p. 258).

Dr Kremer described the gassings of the "muslims" as particulary disturbing or "unpleasant". But why is he so "upset" about them? Possibly because other groups who just came from the trains and who were gassed in this "bunker" was kept calm and were informed they were just going through some kind of delousing, shower, desinfection or something. But these old prisoners knew from what they'd heard from others prisoners or guards that they were about to get killed. After they'd worked in the camp for weeks, months or years, they had seen many other people being taken away to this birch forest and never coming back again.

They werent offered to get undressed in the special hut made for this purpose. They were just expected to undress in the open air (a hint that the guards knew that the prisoners knew) and enter the bunker to be gassed. The scenes outside the bunker were horrible because of how the prisoners reacted, their facial expressions, their last wish to live, their pleading to be saved. These half-dead "muselmänner" suddenly started to show a will to live. They begged to the the SS men to be spared, being fully aware of what was about to happen. Other groups who arrived just followed orders, unaware of the brutal killing machinery going on in this camp for those who were considered "unfit for work".

A so called Muselmann, after Auschwitz liberation

Some people may think that a anathomist like Dr Kremer who had worked with many dead bodies, made autopsy, given lethal injections, experimented with body parts etc. should not be shocked seeing some people being killed. Most likely its not the bodies, their condition, and maybe not even their reaction that shocked him. He is facing his first "Sonderaction" (special treatment, gassing). He is suddenly realizing the cold and mechanical brutality of this death factory. Seeing these pleading prisoners being "herded" by some SS men into the gas chamber made him realize what kind of place he  was working at, a place where groups of people could be picked at any given time to be killed by gassings, a place of extensive, slow and cold genocide. A true death factory, where humans life was weighted in muscle power or workforce, and purposely driven to their limits, as everyone in the end was to be killed. Thus he made the remarks "The most dreadful of horrors.", "This is Anus Mundi".and "Particularly unpleasant was the gassing of the emaciated women from the women's camp". Dr Kremer had just realized what kind of place he was to work at during his 3 months stay. 

Hungarian jews, recently arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau in the early summer of 1944.
Old men, sick people, children and mothers, considered "unfit for work" at the
train platform selection, now standing in the birch wood, waiting to enter
the gaschamber at Crematorium IV. Image from the "Auschwitz album".

Interestingly Kremer doesn't describe the gassings taking place in rooms in direct connection to any large Crematoria building. Instead he says he is "outside" (i.e outside the general camp area, or outside the room where the gassings took place, or outside the car he usually sat in according to his 1947 testimony). He calls the gassing building "the bunker" (singularis), and the women in this case were undressings outdoors in the open. This description fits well with the The Vrba-Wetzler Report written in early 1944, which describes many of the events in Auschwitz from 1942-1943 in detail. In this document they describe for example 

"Twice weekly, Mondays and Thursdays, the camp doctor indi­cated the number of prisoners who were to be gassed and then burned. These 'selections' were loaded into trucks and brought to the Birch Forest. Those still alive upon arrival were gassed in a big barrack erected near the trench used for burning the bodies."

and:

"...1000 persons (women, old people, children as well as men) were sent without further procedure from the railroad siding directly to the Birch Forest, and there gassed and burned."

and

"At the end of February, 1943 a new modern crematorium and gassing plant was inaugurated at BIRKENAU. The gassing and burning of the bodies in the Birch Forest was discontinued, the whole job being taken over by the four specially built crematoria."

These gassings in "a barrack" described in the Vrba-Wetzler Report took place about the same time as the gassings described by Dr Kremer in "the bunker" in autumn 1942. The gassings took place in a temporary building somewhere in the birch forest, and was probably not seen from the camp or from the outside. Possibly the temporary "barrack" or "bunker" wasn't as effetive in the killing process considering that Vrba-Wetzler write this way concerning the newly built Crematorium:

"It is presumed that this is a 'CYANIDE' mixture of some sort which turns into gas at a certain temperature. After three minutes everyone in the chamber is dead. No one is known to have survived this ordeal,although it was not uncommon to discover signs of life after the primitive measures employed in the Birch Wood."

Concerning the "Bunker" Dr Kremer testified at the Krakow trial in 1947:

"On 2 September 1942, at 3 a.m. I was already assigned to take part in the action of gassing people. These mass murders took place in small cottages situated outside the Birkenau camp in a wood. These cottages were called 'bunkers' (Bunker) in the SS men's slang. All SS surgeons, on duty in the camp, took turns to participate in the gassings, which were called 'Sonderaktion' (special action-Editor's note)."

By the way, this camp (Auschwitz II Birkenau) was named after the birch forest right next to it. The German translation of the polish word Brzezinka means "birch forest".

Dr. Johann Paul Kremer

Kremer also wrote in his diary:

10 October 1942 

Extracted and fixed fresh live material from liver, spleen and pancreas... 

12 October 1942 

Second inoculation against typhus, later on in the evening severe generalized reaction (fever). Despite this in the night attended a further Sonderaktion from Holland (1,600 persons). Ghastly scenes in front of the last bunker!  That was the 10th Sonderaktion.

18 October 1942 

In wet and cold weather was on this Sunday morning present at the 11th special action (from Holland). Terrible scenes when 3 women begged to have their bare lives spared. 

8 November 1942 

This night took part in 2 special actions in rainy and murky weather (12th and 13th) [ ... ] Another special action in the afternoon, the 14th so far, in which I had participated [ ... ] 

13 November 1942 

Extracted fresh live material (liver, spleen and pancreas) from a previously photographed, severely atrophied Jewish prisoner aged eighteen.  Fixed as always, liver and spleen in Carnoy and pancreas in Zenker (Prisoner No. 68,030).

Note that Dr Kremer mentions a (personal) "second inoculation [vaccination] against typhus". Typhus was a problem in some of the camps. Holocaust deniers try to spread the idea that about every victim in the Holocaust was just typhus victims or victims of starvation due to the allied bombings preventing transportations. When you study different survivor testimonies together with SS confession you'll find that there were typhus epedemics in the camps while at the same time gassings and executions were taking place. Starvation is also described, just like in the above quoted Kremer notes, describing emaciated "Muselmänner" or "Muslims" from the womens camp at Auschwitz Birkenau. People starved in the camp in 1942, before any allied bombings, because the food they received were not enough considering their hard work. Thus it fulfilled the prediction made in the Wannsee protocol from january 1941: "Able-bodied Jews, separated according to sex, will be taken in large work columns to these areas for work on roads, in the course of which action doubtless a large portion will be eliminated by natural causes."

Dr Kremer was in no way an innocent man in the brutal killing process. He gave lethal injections in the heart area of several prisoners before making his surgical procedures. At the same time his diary shows that he reacted emotionally to some of the gassings, calling them "ghastly scenes", "terrible scenes" etc. It seems he mostly reacted when the prisoners was aware of the killing process and objected, pleading for their lives, begging to the spared. Such kind of prisoner reactions were not common, as he testified in 1947: "Very often no incidents occurred, as the SS men kept people quiet, maintaining that they were to bathe and be deloused." But concerning the pleading women mentioned above he said:

"During the special action, described by me in my diary under the date of 18 October 1942, three women from Holland refused to enter the gas-chamber and begged for their lives. They were young and healthy women, but their begging was of no avail. The SS men, taking part in the action, shot them on the spot."

The treatment of upset prisoners stepping out of line was cold and brutal. According to the Vrba-Wetzler Report "anyone falling out of line was shot". And Kremer described at the second Auschwitz trial where he was a witness: "They entered quietly; only some of them balked; they were taken aside and shot." No matter how cold Kremer was, and no matter how used he was to see and work on dead bodies, he reacted when prisoners started to cry and pleaded for their lives, being shot immedeately or forced into the "bunker" they knew would end their lives.

Based on the contents of his diary and his confessions, Kremer participated in 14 gassings and many medical experiments and performed lethal injections to remove and study body organs. According to his testimony in trials he never gave the fatal phenol injection in the heart area (his coworkers or subordinates did that), but he was present to select the victims and to substract verbal information from them before they were killed with injections.

Johann Kremer was captured and sentenced to death in the Auschwitz Trial (November - December 1947), but this sentence was later commuted to one of life imprisonment. He was released in 1958.

In a new trial in Münster (the city where he became a professor) in 1960 he was sentenced to 10 years in prison and loss of the title of professor and doctor of philosophy. The court held, however, that he had already served his prison sentence and Kremer was pardoned.

He witnessed in the second Auschwitz trial (20 December 1963 - 10 August 1965) in Frankfurt am Main. His testimony concerning the gassings are detailed, and can be read in the book KL Auschwitz seen by the SS, Rudolf Höss, Pery Broad, Paul Kremer.

Johann Paul Kremer died in 1965. As far as i know he never changed his testimony or denied the gassings. His diary and trial testimonies still stands as witness of the reality of the gas chambers at Auschwitz II Birkenau. If the testimony was untrue or a product of torture (a favourite revisionist argument) Dr Kremer had alot of time as a free man to leave a note somewhere (or information in a will, or a last interview, or a writing a book) informing the world about the truth. But he didn't. His three trial testimonies still stands there explaining the meanining of his diary notes from Auschwitz Birkenau in 1942.

Himmlers diary

Himmler and Hitler

After a meeting with Hitler at his headquarter Himmler wrote in his diary, December 18, 1941:

"Judenfrage - als Partisanen auszurotten" 

Translation: "Jewish Question / to be exterminated as partisans." The Jewish Question was a common topic, and an expression often used. The expression Jewish Question is old. It was used in 1750 in Great Britain. Different Solutions to the Jewish Question has been presented earlier when discussing the jewish minority in different countries. Earlier suggestions of "solutions" to the Jewish Question has been assimiliation, integration, education etc. After 1860 the discussion about the Jewish Question started to be more antisemitic. Under the nazi regime in Germany they discussed a "Final Solution" (Endlösung) to the "Jewish Question". Heinrich Himmlers note is short but bears a devastating decision: the solution to the question concerning the jewish minority is that they are to be auszurotten (exterminated) as the partisans are exterminated wherever they are found.

Himmlers diary note

The revisionist David Irving have made some desperate attempts to interpret Himmlers words differently, playing with words very desperatly i'd say. He says it means, during this era, "rooting out" It's kinda funny but at the same time sad to see how he tries to change the meaning of the word auszurotten. But as someone wrote concerning this "According to German dictionaries, it means one thing and one thing only when referring to living beings: to kill."

I am swedish, and in swedish, which is a germanic language, we have a similair word: utrota. If somone here would say utrota means to "pull out the plant with the root", that is to "rota ut", people would laugh, even though the expression is based on that image. Words must be understood in their context, and words must be understood in how they are understood and used by people. The way David Irving has tried to explain the "root out" is not convincing, but rather tragic and desperate, in this context. German people knew what auszurotten means when it comes to pest. Swedish people knows that even if the original words means "root out", it is just a image used, though in the context of dealing with any form of life, wether it is insects, pest, enemies or innocent minorities, "utrota" means to kill, to exterminate, to annihilate. Words must be understood in how they are used by people. It's that simple.

Goebbels diary, 2

Joseph Goebbels

"The Jews are now being deported eastward from the General Government. The procedure is pretty barbaric and one that beggars description, and there's not much left of the Jews. Broadly speaking one can probably say that 60 percent of them will have to be liquidated, while only 40 percent can be put to work."  

(Goebbles diary, March 27, 1942).

Comment: Concerning work/forced labor and liquidation compare with the Wannsee protocol from the conference which took place two months earlier (January 20, 1942). "Under proper guidance, in the course of the final solution the Jews are to be allocated for appropriate labor in the East. Able-bodied Jews, separated according to sex, will be taken in large work columns to these areas for work on roads, in the course of which action doubtless a large portion will be eliminated by natural causes. The possible final remnant will, since it will undoubtedly consist of the most resistant portion, have to be treated accordingly, because it is the product of natural selection and would, if released, act as a the seed of a new Jewish revival (see the experience of history.)"

Goebbels diary

Joseph Goebbels

"World Jewry will suffer a great catastrophe at the same time as Bolshevism. The Fuehrer once more expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will now go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this processwith cold ruthlessness." 

(Joseph Goebbels diary, February 14, 1942).

About the blog

The purpose of this blog is to show some of the evidence for the genocide of the jews (the holocaust) by the NSDAP (nazi party in germany) during ww2.

I will mainly focus on the use of gaschambers as a means of killing, since its one of the most common topic of discussions among revisionist authors as well as right wing extremist people who deny the holocaust.

I will mainly write about the Auschwitz II Birkenau camp, since it is often discussed, and since I've personally focused on that camp when studying the holocaust.

A primary point is to show the absurdity of the revisionist view of the holocaust, since they often say things like

• "human testimonies means nothing" (when human testimonies is presented, though all human testimonies can't be althrough disregarded just like that if you want to be scientific. Any historian must consider the human testimonies of a event especially when there are many testimonies),  
• "they were tortured" (without presenting any proof of the use of torture in the testimony presented, except some other people that was tortured for other reasons at other places by other people)
• "they lied because they are jews, all jews lie" (a unscientific, racist and offensive comment)
• "this person said some numbers that are incorrect or unrealistic, therefor everything he/she says means nothing, he/she is althrough a liar and cannot be trusted at all" (especially remembering numbers of people filling up a room is pretty hard, and even if a person would exaggerate a detail in his/her story, that doesnt mean everything he/she says is a planned outright lie based on some conspiracy groups agenda, and its very unscientific and racist to disregard someone just because he is a jew). 

People who deny the holocaust (or the use of gaschambers as a means of genocide by the nazis during ww2) seem to believe they can undermine everything by just pointing out minor errors in testimonies. And that's where the conspiracy comes in. It's based on the idea that there is a agenda behind all human testimonies. This agenda is usually racist, antisemitic, though mostly disguised in many ways. Some say it is all Gräuelpropaganda (german: atrocity propaganda stories), some old war propaganda of the enemies cruelties still flourishing. They pick up real old fake stuff, like the soap made of jewish fat from victims, or lampshades made of jewish skin, proven false a long time ago, or the shrunken heads. They love to bring up these old stuff though modern historians don't believe in them and seldom mention them.

Their worldview seem to be based on simplicity. It's like they can't (or are not interested in) accepting that the world and history is complex. It is true that both the axis powers and the allies used propaganda. It is also true that some things believed by historians in the past is now disregarded or revised, for example which camps used gas chambers and how many victims died at the auschwitz camp. History is always revised by historians.

History will show what stands the test of time. If the gaschambers is to be considered one of those old atrocity stories it must be part of a very complex (and absurd and impossible) tree of propaganda. It is simply absurd that so many people would be involved and still today continue lying when the war is over. And it is also absurd that so many details in the documents, diaries, speeches and confessions by the nazis support the holocaust and the gassings in the extermination camps. We now have like hundreds of "signs" pointing at the same direction (some of them very explicit, and some of them just very convincing) and we do not have massive proof pointing at the opposite direction. Do we have ANY proof at the opposite direction except some desperate attempts to disregard the use of gas by doing test at a museum/memorial site? Do we have any survivors, any jew, gypsie, prisoner of war, homosexual, "asocial". political prisoner or any other survivor of the camp, that have come out and describe how all those old, sick and kids (with their mothers) who were considered "unfit for work" survived after the selection at the platform at Auschwitz Birkenau? It would be so easy for just one or two or three of them to step up and tell the story. He or she would become famous and could write lots of books and stuff, proving his own identity and testifying about what was really going on in the camp. Where are such kind of survivor?

One can summarise it like this: The revisionists says its all war propaganda and lies, and the historians wont change their minds concerning use of gas chambers as long as the argument presented is based on racism and conspiracy theories. One of these arguments is "human testimonies means nothing", "all the human testimonies we have seen cannot be trusted". What we are talking about here is at least 10 (there might be more) SS witnesses concerning gassing at the Auschwits camp alone. Then there are other SS witnesses to the gassings in other camps. We also have a couple of eyewitnesses from the Sonderkommando squad (prisoners forced to work in the gas chambers and crematorias). I dont know how many but i've come across 3 or 4 so far. Then we have many indirect witnesses from the prisoners at Auschwitz Birkenau who often saw new trains arrive and the same procedure take place as they had been through: the unloading of people from the trains, the selection of those who were fit for work and those who were unfit, the unfit walking towards the area of the Crematorias (usually Crematoria II and III near the platform where they were, at the end of the railroad), and these people was never seen again. These "indirect" witnesses also heard about the genocide from other prisoners and from guards. They were warned to obey and harassed by hearing that they could end up like their own relatives "up the chimney" while they pointed at the crematorias. Some of them heard this warning just after arrival after they had been seperated from family members at the selection.

I consider this last category of eyewitnesses just as important as the direct eyewitnesses who saw the killings with their own eyes. If the "unfit for work" people were not killed there in the gaschambers, where did they go? Why havent any historian or revisionist presented proof that they survived somehow. Are they all disregarding the prisoners seeing these trains arrive day by day? It must be pointed out that sometimes prisoners were moved from Auschwitz to other camps for different reasons. But no one have proven that this happened to the unfit for work groups after selection at the platform.

Another common type of argument the revisionist use is the typhus epedemics in the camps. It is true that some of the camps had a typhus epedemic. But several reports by survivors describe both the typhus epedemics and the killings by gassings. One thing doesnt have to exclude the other you know. It is possibly also true that most of those starved, sick and dead people shown at the early liberation movies and photos are victims of typhus and starvation, a starvation that might have to do with the war and also SS guards leaving the camps when the allies came closer. But that doesnt say anything about the gassings. Its just images from the liberation of some of the camps, though sometimes used by the alllies to show how cruel the nazis were. And honestly, if the nazis "just" stole the homes from jews and others, put them in cattle waggons on trains to ghettos and camps, isolating them, forcing them to live under diffictult conditions, that would be cruel in itself, and its no wonder the allied soldiers reacted and the press went there to document what they found. These images was not shown to prove the use of gas chambers anyway.

Then there are some revisionists who point out that there was actually survivors when the allies arrived. They reason like this: if the nazis wanted to exterminate all jews, why didnt they do it right away, and why did many survive. But these revisionists forget that evidence points to a decision by the nazis to kill off the "unfit" right away and then use the rest of the prisoners for forced labour as long as they could endure, until they die off. Survivors also describe that when people got too sick they were sometimes killed one way or the other. There were often selections in the camp to see if people had become unfit for work and must be killed. So the camp prisoners were just kept alive to work, and sometimes they were even given help by doctors to stay fit for work. But this, in itself, does not prove that there was no massive genocide goiing on, especially after the selection at the train platform. The genocide of the jews during ww2 includes some absurdities. Sometimes prisoners were killed for minor things. Sometimes they were saved and kept alive for minor things. The photos of the kids used in medical experiments shows some of this absurdities. These kids were kept alive, but not to live and get better, but to be test objects.

If the revisionists are right. If their view of history is correct and the official historical view is wrong, i think Hitler & co must be very upset in heaven/hell that so much evidence is against them and that they lack convincing proof for their story. They must think that Goebbles and Himmler wrote very stupid things in their diaries, that SS men lied so much about the gassings, even after the trials were over, and that so many survivors testify against them and that no survivors say something in their defence when they were treated good. Hitler must regret alot of things he said in his speeches about "extermination of the jewish race", and Himmler must regret his speech at Posen where he so openly talked about it. They must regret they executed a million jews or more by the einzatsgruppen in Poland. They must regret they talked about the jews as the major enemy in the war, and described the jewish race so evil it must be exterminated during the war for the future to be safe. They must be upset that the overall testimony evidence against them is so convincing that saying the holocaust didn't take place, or the gassings didnt take place, is like saying all survivors of the Titanic, or the WTC, or M/S Estonia, or the 2004 tsunami, are liars and manipulators. By the way, some human testimonies from these disasters contain minor errors, exaggerations and in some cases supernatural events, and in these disasters the early reports included errors that historians today knows are false.  

I also want to say that anyone should study history with an open mind and be ready to question things. Sometimes the official story can be wrong, manipulated or based on a political agenda. For example, the Palestine-Israel conflict is described very differently in different parts of the world, and the reports of what's going on there focus on different things. Sometimes history must be revised. I think for anyone interested in this particular subject (holocaust vs revisionism) should study both sides. But be ready for propaganda. Just as you might encounter some old war propaganda when you study history, you will encounter alot of conspiracy and racism if you study those who question all the SS testimonies, all the Sonderkommando witnesses, all the auschwitz survivors who describe this horrible event in history. Don't fall for anything. Dont be afriad to study everything.

I do believe in freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and i dont think anyone should end up in prison for having a different opinion. I also believe famous authors have a lot of responsible for what they write, as they can influence alot of people in different directions.

Introduction

Welcome to my new blog.

In this blog i will deal with the subject holocaust vs revisionism, or more precisely: the official historical view of the genocide of the jews during world war 2 vs those who deny the holocaust or deny there was a planned agenda by the nazis to exterminate the jewish race by using gaschambers and other methods.

Since the revisionists tend to disregard every single document, speech, diary, eyewitness and witnesses supporting the planned extermination of the jews, and the use of gaschambers, i will present these to make it obvious to all how big the conspiracy must be if it was a conspiracy or lie. To me, and i think to anyone who look through the evidence, it absurd to believe its all lies and war propaganda. 

I will present some of the testimonies and documents. Sometimes i will also comment. I also invite the readers of the blog to comment and discuss.

For mor information about this blog, read my next post.